We've updated our Privacy Policy to make it clearer how we use your personal data.

We use cookies to provide you with a better experience. You can read our Cookie Policy here.

Advertisement

Mycena Can Invade Living Hosts

A  researcher holding Mycena in the field.
Credit: Christoffer Bugge Harder.
Listen with
Speechify
0:00
Register for free to listen to this article
Thank you. Listen to this article using the player above.

Want to listen to this article for FREE?

Complete the form below to unlock access to ALL audio articles.

Read time: 4 minutes

Fungi Biologists have long known mushrooms of the genus Mycena, commonly known as bonnet mushrooms, as fungi that live off of dead trees and plants. New research from the University of Copenhagen demonstrates that bonnets can also find their ways into young, healthy trees and plants, where they try to cooperate. In doing so, they have made an evolutionary leap which challenges our understanding of the ecological roles of fungi.

Fungal spores float through the air. Thin strands of their mycelia creep along surfaces. They seek out defenseless hosts to wrap themselves around in webs of fungal growth. Their victims can then be used to satisfy their own need to devour and disperse.


That fungi have begun to invade the living is a horrific thought for anyone who ever thought that fungi only dined upon the dead.  Or, at least for those who stream The Last of Us, a post-apocalyptic series in which humans battle relentless fungal-infected zombies.

Fortunately, reality is rarely so dramatic. But after Danish mycologists targeted local Mycena, known as bonnet mushrooms, it turned out that certain similarities emerged nevertheless.

Want more breaking news?

Subscribe to Technology Networks’ daily newsletter, delivering breaking science news straight to your inbox every day.

Subscribe for FREE

New research from the University of Copenhagen’s Department of Biology suggests that this genus of fungi, which has traditionally been considered saprotrophic – i.e., a decomposer of nonliving organic matter – is in the midst of an evolutionary leap.


"Using DNA studies, we found that Mycena fungi are consistently found in the roots of living plant hosts. This suggests that bonnets are in the process of an evolutionary development, from uniquely being decomposers of nonliving plant material to being invaders of living plants, under favourable conditions," explains Christoffer Bugge Harder, the study’s lead author.


The research also demonstrates that some of these bonnet mushrooms species even show early signs of being able to act as mutualists – i.e., live in symbiosis with trees. Unlike the terrifying fungi in The Last of Us, the researchers believe that Mycena are primarily out to do good, as seen from the plant's perspective. This comes in the form of a kind of evolutionary courtship in which they live in harmony with their living hosts.

Good deeds challenge traditional roles

"Other fungi, the Amanita genus for example, are known to work together with living plants, an ability that they developed many millions of years ago. But Amanita have long since lost their ability to survive without their hosts. And that’s how we traditionally divided fungi into strictly separate ecological groups: mutualistic, parasitic or saprophytic," explains Christoffer Bugge Harder.

Mycena seem to fall somewhere in between the ecological niches.

"The strict division has been increasingly called into question, and our Mycena research supports a blurring of the lines. Some Mycena have found their own solution and span several different ecological roles," says Harder.


By looking at carbon isotopes in Mycena, the researchers were able to conclude that these fungi are saprotrophic decomposers, as well as mutualistic. And perhaps even parasitic.


"Mycena are opportunists. Unlike Amanita, they can easily grow without needing to invade plants, but should the opportunity arise, it’s a nifty bonus. They also seek out living roots, where they have nitrogen to offer – as fungi can take up nitrogen easier than a tree – for a reasonable price," explains Christoffer Bugge Harder.


Payment comes either in the form of carbon from the host while it is living, or when their friendly host dies, and the patient decomposer gets to work. Or perhaps both.

Seizing a human created opportunity

The favourable conditions sought after by Mycena seem to be related to human activity.

"It is reasonable to believe that we humans have played a role in this adaptation, because our monocultural plantations, stands of forest for example, have provided fungi with optimal conditions for adapting. The fungi seem to have seized upon this opportunity," he says.

Facts: The fungal kingdom’s three ecological niches

  • Species that have specialized in living off of nonliving vegetation for millions of years are known as saprotophic fungi.
  • Species that feed on living vegetation are called parasitic fungi.
  • Fungi that coexist symbiotically with living trees and plants and exchange nutrients with their host are known as mutualistic.

However, the traditionally strict division of fungi into three ecological niches is increasingly being called into question. Mycena is a new example of a fungus that blurs the lines.

"Specialists thrive in old-growth forest. In this scenario, there aren’t many chances for Mycena to settle on living trees because specialized fungi are already present in this natural setting and don’t allow others in," says the mycologist.


On the other hand, human cultivated homogeneous plantations with young plants of the same age give Mycena a chance, because specialized fungi have yet to establish themselves. The same applies to harsh environments, such as in the Arctic, or disturbed environments, e.g., where there are many grazing animals about.


"These places present challenging conditions for many organisms, but Mycena are among those that seem to benefit," says Christoffer Bugge Harder.


Reference: Harder CB, Hesling E, Botnen SS, et al. Mycena species can be opportunist‐generalist plant root invaders. Environmental Microbiology. 2023;25(10):1875-1893. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16398


This article has been republished from the following materials. Note: material may have been edited for length and content. For further information, please contact the cited source.